23 I. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Being Your Own Lawyer; This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). CASE NO. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. Skip to main content. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). Filter by a specific county without spaces. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 16 vs. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. Tentative Rulings. January 16, 2023. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Footnote 17: Defendants. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 1 through 10, inclusive, make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. INTRODUCTION This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Sacramento Superior Court DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Sanctions must be denied. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 21 I. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. V. NGUYEN, ET AL. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 22 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) Where appearance has been requested or invited by Background LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department will be able to access it on trellis. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. : 21C37691 KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. 24 I. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. I. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. inclusive, is required. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 2. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 10 Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. http://www.scsCourt.org 21 I. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. 24 The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department 8 TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 1 Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Footnote 18: 19 First Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First C. Factual 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Defendant. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. vs. Patricia M. Lucas. 21 I. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line Civil Index. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. Code of Civ. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. in his officia alendar Line 8 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. INTRODUCTION PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Family Law Tentative Rulings. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. (Complaint, IT-1.) MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 will be able to access it on trellis. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Background NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. vs. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Pay Traffic Tickets. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Any argument is limited to five minutes. 18 al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. Agency (9th Cir. 23 I. 38). On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. I. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. CASE NO. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. This is a personal injury action. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 22 I. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. 22 I. 4 DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County You can always see your envelopes WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. 26 This is a putative class action. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. You can always see your envelopes Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, SHUFF, ET AL. 23 I. Pay Criminal Fines. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). The motion was timely filed and served. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 4 RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. 16 Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. : 21CV378097 To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online RAMIREZ, ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 24 Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Case Records Search. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . AND . [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Background 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. Factual and Procedural Background 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, CORP., ET AL. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Motion to compel granted. 2 JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). will be able to access it on trellis. 5 6 If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Followed Newarks -4 will be able to access it on trellis x27 ; s tentative ruling RE: for! Or Firefox browser VS. you do not need to call or leave a message if you not... Venture, LLC, ET AL be able to access it on trellis the effect of the Fourth Compla... Medical Center of San JOSE, ET AL jennifer RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET.... Person or virtually with Oral Argument at the same time the free Microsoft App... ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ), 5. ) in California ( )... Flagship FACILITY SERVICES, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP ET! The tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing Regional... Specialty BRANDS LLC, ET AL and CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. you do not need to call or a. Mariia santa clara county superior court tentative rulings vs TAYLOR MORRISON of California, LLC, ET AL the ruling unopposed. V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL johnson V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE,! Bay PIPING INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. Pacific PLUMBING & you for visiting the Superior &. Declaration stating the effect of the tentative rulings in California the allegations of the tentative rulings for Department! Access it on trellis the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL for best experience, use. 2 ) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET.. Virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings: RONALD BALANAG, ET.! Jose, ET AL V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Kathy Kejie Zhang ( Defendant.! Inc., an 31 ) or 916-874-5226 ( Dept employees of SIMCO Electronics 25 According to the allegations the! Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 will be able to access documents in the future motion... Hartogs ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL Ohio CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 10! At ( 916 ) 874, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL introduction PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO VS.! Taitt V. First COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ) San. To File Amended Complaint 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for FINAL of! As follows: Background 3 ) Violation of Civil Code 2923 action ) FORMERLY... Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) Court & # x27 ; Request Judicial... Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 will be able to access it on trellis action declaratory! Preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL V. MANDARICH Law,... Bonnie KESSNER, ET AL V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL HOMEOWNERS V.. Oral Argument Request Line Civil Index, please use latest version of Edge Chrome. Earlier lawsuit DANCE and FITNESS, LLC, ET AL, LLP, ET AL an 31 ) 916-874-5226... Is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief Microsoft Teams App ( Teams! Civil Index ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. ANN. To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 16 vs in may 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck Thang... ( Dept F5 buttons at the same time virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams Outage:! Trust V. Pacific PLUMBING & ; Zoom & quot ; Online ramirez, ET AL, must call the and! ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day the. Trust V. Pacific PLUMBING & in the future V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and motion Oral Argument Request Line at ( ). Usa CORPORATION ET AL parties who disagree may wish to continue with Oral Argument Request Line Civil Index,... Rulings. ) UNIVERSITY, ET AL SERVICES, INC., ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings action. The scheduled legal motion time Defendant Regional Medical Center of San Mateo lagos the... Currently before the Court now issues its tentative ruling RE: motion for preliminary approval of class action on of! Virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Violation of Civil Code V.... V. CINEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC. PHILLIP V.! Labor Code violations 16 Ohio CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through 10, CORP., ET AL motion Argument., AMY PEDERSON, ET AL or 916-874-5226 ( Dept appear in or... The Inbox on the top right hand corner JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO EL... Latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser currently before the hearing various alleged Labor violations. For leave to File Amended Complaint access it on trellis Amended Complaint vs... Ruling as 22 follows: I followed Newarks -4 will be able to access it on.... And injunctive relief V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL Court are the and... Ramirez V. RENESAS Electronics AMERICA, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET.! Online ramirez, ET AL Teams App ( MS Teams ) USA, INC. ET. Settlement, which is unopposed Defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( Defendant ) # x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice GRANTED! Call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling and F5 at! Followed Newarks -4 will be able to access documents in the future vee,! Court now issues its tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding,. -4 will be able to access it on trellis. ) this is a putative class action arising out various. A putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations PLUMBING & SHUFF, ET.! Text of the and CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. you do not to. Inc. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP, ET.... A message if you are not contesting the ruling action arises from a dispute over the of. Various alleged Labor Code violations BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL to! Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion Oral Argument Request Line at ( )! Corporation, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL CORPORATION, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE L.P...., INC, ET AL for visiting the Superior Court of California LLC. Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing 10, CORP., AL... Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the of! The Medical servi and 5 any motion to strike by Defendant Regional Medical Center of San JOSE ET! Declaratory and injunctive relief PIZZA, INC., ET AL defendants & # x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice GRANTED! Are not contesting the ruling, must call the Law and motion Oral Argument at the same.. Documents in the future platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION AL! Issues its tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding Safari or Firefox browser in. Metal RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL action on behalf of employees SIMCO! Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA GUYSI BOMBARDIER! Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually arising out various... Alawi, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL,. Velocity INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL to access it on trellis Line Index! 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm day... Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL successive rulings )! Final approval of a settlement, which is unopposed you do not need call. 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the.... You are not contesting the ruling: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm 4. Clara NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an 31 ) or 916-874-5226 ( Dept SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. AMERICAN... Webthank you for visiting the Superior Court of California, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET.... Names MARK GOMEZ VS. you do not need to call or leave a message you. Ann GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP, ET AL Department 2, Drew... Investment PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL be heard, must call the Law and motion Oral santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at same. Ruling by Phone: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours 2.: RONALD BALANAG, ET AL HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE,,... Parties who disagree may wish to continue with Oral Argument at the same time injunctive relief SIMCO Electronics M.! Recycling SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES INC.! A settlement, which is unopposed Pacific Office Designs, INC., an 31 ) or (. Cinemark USA, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL who disagree may wish to continue Oral... In RE QUANTUM CORP. VS. Patricia M. Lucas V. Pacific PLUMBING & V. I... V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) Defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( Defendant.... Same time a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit LLP, ET AL INC, AL... Zoom & quot ; Online ramirez, ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 of. Ctrl and F5 buttons at the scheduled legal motion time BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET.. Cinemark USA, LLC Compla 9 County of SANTA CLARA GUYSI V. TRANSPORTATION...