canon 135mm f2 astrophotography canon 135mm f2 astrophotography

Make sure to select your camera mount when checking the price (Check current price). (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble. It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. What next, an article extolling the virtues of 43mm, or 70mm? So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. You're right, but a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels I bought put to use! Interesting. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. It is fantastic on my old 5d. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. Off topic, #light_bulb I would disagree. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. [emailprotected]. 1. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. At a local amateur soccer game using the 135 f/2 the action was almost always too close, or too far away. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. 2. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. I have the Canon 135 f/2 and loved it from day one. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 This lens provides all of these requirements. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. I read and bought it. I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. I like fast lenses, and my Nikkor 105DC is my favourite. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. In this post, Ill explain why I think the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is the perfect addition to an arsenal of astrophotography lenses. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. In the middle of the OM System lineup, the OM-5 promises yesterday's top-tier performance in a lighter, more compact body. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. Sme of the wide field are. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Big F-value.Light. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. With the 135 I imagine I'd have to get up on the roof. But do some experimenting before you decide. At under 900USD, it's a steal. thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. Smooth but contrasty. Focal length is great. This is one of my all time favourites. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. BirdDog P240 40X NDI PTZ Camera. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. The thing is, on my APS-C body the 100mm is challenging enough. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. 45 minutes. Thomas, I do have no experience with the Canon lens you mentioned but zoom lenses have limitations concerning aberrations while providing more flexibility.The Nikkor 70-200/4 that I like as a travel lens is a very good performer but the Zeiss 135/2 APO is in a different league. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. My copy is 12-years-old and still delivers at over 75 weddings a year. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 If you want the best possible image quality, and you must have autofocus, and you don't care if it is a bit heavy (maybe you need it for studio use), buy the Sigma. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. :). My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. I therefore reduce the aperture at the front end of the lens (as an aperture stop) by screwing in a series of step-down rings into the filter thread. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. $581.00 for 7 days. Could use a few updates. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Thanks & Cheers It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. It's gross, all is a matter of balance and the perfect one, given you want sharp and fuzzy elements in your picture, is in the blend, and the way details seems to disappear gracefully (while keeping a level of readability). Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix). D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. Write your own user review for this lens. We revisit a classic DPReviewTV episode in which Chris Niccolls and Jordan Drake shoot a few rolls of Fujifilm's Acros 100 II, and a few frames on the X-T3 in Acros film simulation, to find out. enlarge. $218.00 for 7 days. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Other times, like the Witch Head Nebula, I love seeing the star responsible for the object in all its glaring glory! (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 A lot of us have been saying this for years. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. A Bargain, very competively priced And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. Large focus ring. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. IQ will rival any other lens. I got this lens because of portraiture. Please send your photos of the Andromeda galaxy. Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. I'll take photo of Orion as soon as possible. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. The duck and cat are really the only good shots. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. This is one of the sharpest lens i've ever owned. CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. AHAB. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. Not too heavy. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance.